Find a Lawyer

GHULAM HAIDER versus THE STATE

Sections 302/324/148 and 149 of the Terrorist Activities (Special Courts) Act (X of 1975), Section 7 Definition of Evidence Medical evidence ignored the prosecutor's version as a doctor while both victims performed post mortem examination. No fragments were found. At the time of the incident, the two victims allegedly did not have raw food in their stomachs, the presence of eyewitnesses was also ignored from the site plan prepared by the prosecution's witnesses as they did not find any vacant place. Was. He was allegedly fired and found out about fifty feet away from where the suspects allegedly fired on the prosecutor's story that all the accidents on all motorcycles came to the spot. He was suspected that when the witnesses were attracted to the noise, the victim did not turn to the accused and they continued to take food from the accused to the accused and beat him on the back and identified with the complainant against the identity and There was an argument that was against both the deceased, but it was not dropped on the occasion where the prosecution's story was suspected when the parties involved. Former rivalry witnessed the confession of both witnesses. On the record proved, the absence of the prosecution's sole injured witness, who could not be suspected to be present on the occasion, raised serious doubts over the prosecution's story, the criminal release of the crime immediately after his recovery. Not to mention in the laboratory, and at the same time, the crime was empty. Inquiry reports were sufficient to indicate that the accused had recovered the alleged weapons of crime. ask a advocate free from Harnai lawyer