MST. SHAUKAT ARA versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, PESHAWAR
Article 13 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional subpoena A pre-custody case by a person having a property owned by a person in the form of Jat Jat. Both do not have full proprietary rights on the respective property and do not grant the individual free rights if any default is committed by the leasehold rights in any of the properties during the lease period, such as retaining the lease. Unless the property is shown in respect of this property. In the present case, admittedly owned by the government and leased only for a fixed period, on payment of annual rent, the components required for pre-emptive rights were missing. And no lawsuit could be brought by the pre-emptor in this regard
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for advocates from Pindi bhohri lawyer
