Find a Lawyer

BAKHT JAMAL versus THE STATE

Sections 6, 7, 8 and 9 (c) of the Customs Act (IV of 1969), sections 2 (s) and 156 (1) (8) (89) contradict the material points in the statements of the prosecution witnesses in the definition of evidence. Was not found. The defense said the witnesses were examined at length, but they opposed the investigation on all material and related aspects, saying that nothing could be extracted from the mouths of the prosecution witnesses, so that in the case of the prosecution. Can't fetch anything. In this case a false and genuine criminal was recorded on the record to prove his position in the charge of involvement in the incident and brought him to the real and guilty record by the accused to prove the claim. He was found to be lying and genuinely involved in the case. The complainant police officer had the opportunity to make good escape in the nearby forest while the witnesses were in the house, no such advice was given to the witnesses, he proceeded through the accused, then he The burden shifted to prove it, but he failed to do so, a large number of marijuana could not immigration advocates contact from Hazro lawyer