In the present case, the appellate court did not justify the question only on the date when the sale agreement was made, for the specific performance of the contract to sell the buyer's right against the seller with the improper title of sections 18 and 12. Was implemented. The defendant was not the owner of the property the appellate court had committed on the validity, unlawful if the defendant was not the owner of the property in dispute over the date of the execution of the contract of sale and then acquired the title. Then in accordance with Section 18 (a), the Special Relief Act, 1877, the buyer could compel him to make a good deal out of the interest which he later acquired after he had acquired the title to the property in dispute. Was obliged to execute the found agreement.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
