Find a Lawyer

BAKHT ZAMIN SHAH versus FAIZ MUHAMMAD KHAN

Section 13 (3) (a) (ii) requires the landlord's essential goods for determination The landlord was primarily responsible for establishing his claim through substantial and credible evidence that the landlord's need was reasonable and justified. Should be taken and not proved by a bad faith. Good faith means that honestly doing nothing and not being motivated by motivation was the main thing in determining the landlord's ability to use a particular premises for his or her own personal use of Section 13 (4). Needed to be provided, the West Pakistan Citizens Rent Restriction Ordinance, 1959, was a proper safeguard against misuse of the provisions of section 13 (3) (a) (ii) of the Ordinance by the landlord where the landlord's statement was trustworthy. And none of the content was on record. Remove from the fact, such a statement should be given full weight and should not be treated as a statement of any interested person who is a trial court finding against the tenant upon release. The ues were provided with the help of the evidence on the record, and no evidence of false reading or unreadability was identified, suggesting that the need for a sow feed was purely a factual question and where the two courts together Together, it was found that the landlord was important for personal use because of the landlord. , The High Court refused to intervene in the second appeal famous lower court advocate from Silanwala lawyer