Find a Lawyer

ZULFIQAR-UL-HUSNAIN versus OIL AND GAS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

Sections 5 and 6 (1C) of the Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 of the Pakistan (1973), Article 212, from Executive Group I to Executive Group III to Assistant Officers (Non-technical) and Assistant Officers (Technical). ) Both were placed in NPS 16 before the development of the pay scale instead of the pay scale, which was placed in Executive Groups I and II respectively. The dispute between the appellant assistant officers (non-technical) was that their e. There will be no change in the amount of change from GI to EG II as it relates to Assistant Officers in both categories; and that they have to be Assistant Officer (Non-Technical) and Assistant Acer (E to maintain consistency between technical) G e G-III were entitled to develop the service because I appeal to appeals tribunal was dismissed on the grounds. The officer placed in the EGI cannot go in the EG III without spending five years. Services in EG II. And, the two types can't be treated the same. Both the Weldability Assistant Officer (Non-Technical) EGI and the Assistant Officer (Technical) EG II fall into the same category of employees. There is no discrimination in terms of development. The Promotion Board's claim by the Appellants on behalf of the next Higher Group, EG III, will not contradict the decision of the Board as clearly indicated in its letter of 28 1 1980. Quality and other terms and conditions of employment. After the introduction of the paygroups, the officers will not make any changes when the Supreme Court accepts the appeals and, as a result, decides on the extent of the appeals decision that they have made since the date of its development in EG III. criminal advocate from Kohistan lawyer