ABDUL QAYYUM versus D.G., PROJECT MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION, JS HQ, RAWALPINDI
RR 3 (b), 4 (1) (b) (iv), 5 and 6 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 1212 (3) Conducting Regular Inquiry Dismissed without service. The public servant was accused of producing fake documents to obtain housing services for his co-employee. On the basis of preliminary inquiries, the showcase notice issued by the Government Employee Authorized Authority, responding to a government employee's accusation of misconduct, indicating that the public employee was found guilty of misconduct, shows that public employees ( The Preliminary Inquiry was made for the purpose of collecting evidence in support of the charge of conducting a regular investigation under the Rules and Regulations (1973) Rules, 1973. Under the rules it was necessary to provide him with a reasonable opportunity to respond to the allegations, the public servant was entitled to examine the witnesses and to present evidence, regularly in the light of the evidence and inquiries of the inquiry officer's inquiry officer. An appropriate order may be approved in return of the authority, but the respondents, without having seen the procedure for inquiry, had given a large penalty to the public servant under preliminary inquiry. The note states that public servants are being prosecuted against corruption under the provisions of the Public Employees (Performance and Discipline) Rules, 1973, therefore, without a clear order to distribute the need for regular investigation. The departure from the job was not legal for corruption by conducting an appropriate investigation and giving it an opportunity to be heard.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
