PROVINCE OF SINDH versus SAIMA BANO
Section 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 1212 (3) Termination of Service Department Appeal / Representation The Authorized Authority terminated the employee from the employment and the Government employees for refusing to consider such appeal / representation under the postal certificate. Is preferred. The Appeal / Representation Submitted Under the Postal Cover The Appellate Authority did not consider this appeal in any way or, for reasons not well known to the relevant constituents by the appellate authority. Was not a public servant, the possibility of a personal hearing was not raised before the termination orders were passed, neither the authenticity of the postal certificate nor its truth was challenged, nor the service tribunal's appeal by the service tribunal. They were questioned by the administration before, the suspension order was set aside and the case remanded. Was sent. New authorization of decision-making authority where employees were not provided with a personal hearing before the termination order was approved, such an order would be nullified. The Service Tribunal had rightly allowed the appeal and the order of dismissal approved by the Service Tribunal was reasonably reasonable and reasonable. The Supreme Court ruled that the misrepresentation or misreading of the material available on the record was not detected. The question of the importance of the common people was not included in the matter. The appeal was denied.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top civil advocates from FR Tank / DI Khan lawyer