MUKHTIYAR AHMAD versus THE STATE
Section 497 (2) fornication of the adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), section 10/16 bail, further sanction of further investigation charges against the accused was allegedly attracted to the complainant and He was subjected to adultery. The accused allegedly denied the accusation and claimed that the complainant had entered into a valid marriage with her and that he was living with her as his wife and thereafter He was forced to change his position under pressure from parents. Prior to the Family Court police record, it was revealed that the Family Court Police Record revealed that in the final investigation, it was found that the complainant was acting on the consent of the party and, according to his own custom, the accused. Had escaped It found that the complainant's statement could produce any credibility against the accused when he excluded himself from the accused's charge, under the circumstances, under section 497 of the accused, sub-section (2) of the CR PC Further investigation of his upcoming crime case is needed, he was admitted on bail.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous lower court advocate from Bat Khela lawyer