MUHAMMAD YOUNAS versus SHAUKAT ALI
Section 70 Trademarks Rules, 1963, R78 Civil Procedure Code (VV 1908), OV, RR 10A, 17, 18, 19 and 20 powers and the Registrar of Trademarks scope service's notice explained on the other side of the duty registrar That the Registrar was not to act unethically in the absence of any party, but rather to present himself to the other party in connection with the service of a notice so that upon his return before the decision was made by all parties only To be decided The notice was not issued and only once, the Registrar, in the present case, followed the report of his office and without consent to complete the service, using other methods for alternative procedures or by posting a reference in the paper. Previous order passed. Reviewed by the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, the CPC's rules and regulations apply in cases where the act itself or its rules did not say, the provisions of the OV; Will apply in the principles of
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate from Ali Chak lawyer
