Find a Lawyer

ZULFIQAR HAIDER versus THE STATE

The value of the evidence contained in Sections 2 302 (b) and ???re evidence was not known at that time and it was not known how and where the deceased was executed with the deceased on the identification of the accused. Because the policeman who was involved in the investigation made contradictory statements that no witnesses were involved in the recovery process from the area where the pistol was recovered, the suspect was in police custody the day the blank was recovered and The forensic science laboratory was sent. Unless the refusal to tamper with the recovery of an empty and pistol is not positive, the positive result of the firearm will not be helpful to the prosecution; there is no direct or circumstantial evidence linking the suspect to the commission of the crime. Was. It is not known how the deceased was killed and who was the assailant. Regarding the material fact, the recovery of the body on the identity of the accused is also believed. , Only section 201, shall be relevant to the purpose of PPC and there will be no evidence to establish murder charge, evidence of recovery of crime weapon is not affected by trust, there will be no contradictory evidence to be used against the prosecution. ? The trial court did not disclose the defendant's ability to prove the crime of the accused beyond the reasonable doubt of the sentence or sentence and the sentence. power of attorney advocate Theing Jattan More lawyer