MUHAMMAD LATIF versus ELECTION TRIBUNAL FOR RAWALPINDI (ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, ATTOCK)
Section 52 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 199 and 225 Constitutional Petitions Repeat counting applicants were announced, respondents who were challenged by the election petition with only one vote, Election Tribunal voted The counting and re-counting resulted in 494 votes of respondents / non-respondents while 457 were found after the rejection of relevant votes of the applicant / returning candidate and consequently the respondent candidate. Was chosen instead of the applicant who was initially justified in being elected He was. The Election Tribunal was either comfortable in the daily order sheet or in the decision itself as to why the Election Tribunal decided to reject the respondents' five votes and the 43 votes of the petitioning Election Tribunal deciding such a sensitive question. Proceed in a casual way and why not? Adopt appropriate procedure for counting of votes The High Court has put aside the Election Tribunal's decision that the election petition filed before the Election Tribunal be considered pending and the Election Tribunal after the parties have been summoned by the High Courts. Will re-count the votes as instructed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
