Section 302 (b) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Re-examination of the evidence Recovery of the crime from the location of the ocular account inconsistent with the medical evidence A suspect was told to be equipped with 32 pistols and medical. The report stated that the victim suffered a sharp blow to his person while another was subjected to a weapon, the trial court sentenced the accused to life imprisonment while the High Court accepted the appeal and sentenced the accused. Made worse. The authenticity and the collar account did not encourage the trust because it contradicts the medical evidence. The pistol recovery did not result in any vacancy as no vacancies were recovered from the site of the incident and no one was arrested to link the accused to the crime commission. Material evidence was not identified. There was no legal weakness in the High Court's decision by which the Supreme Court refused to appeal the interference bail.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
