ABDUL GHAFOOR versus SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, JHANG
R6 (3) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) Conduct mandatory retirement professional misconduct and unnecessary extraordinary investigation of police officer conducting general police action and process Government employee was a police officer and honored. Was awarded. The mandatory retirement sentence from the service order offered by the public servants was submitted by the public servant that there was no formal inquiry by the public servants which was against the rules. Waldetti Police was a disciplinary force and if the Authority had decided that regular inquiry was not required, the authority would adopt the summary procedure under R6 (3) of the Punjab Police (Discipline and Discipline) Rules 1975. May approve of professional misconduct and irregularities from a public servant, a member of the discipline's force, proved by his bad records to be earned permanently in his service record, will not require regular investigation As provided under R6 (4) of Punjab, the service record of a civil servant has been given and rightly he is of the opinion that he is a police officer. No longer able to remain in the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court refused to intervene in the order. The appeal was denied by the authority levy
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of advocates from Gaggo Mandi lawyer