Find a Lawyer

HAMIDULLAH KHAN versus CH. MUHAMMAD JAMEEL

R70 Constitution Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Right-wing examination of the election petition, elections were held for the closure of the parties, seats of the nominee and deputy nominee applicants were declared return candidates and the respondents filed the election. Attacked. On the basis that the applicants had submitted the nomination papers, the declaration form had misinterpreted their assets: The Applicants' Council could not appear in court at the date when the due date was set for proof of the case. And, instead of postponing the Election Tribunal case, the Chief recorded the examination in the witnesses and closed the petitioner's right to examine the witnesses, the Election Tribunal also closed the petitioner's right, the constitutional jurisdiction. The ruling did not interfere with the orders passed by the High Court. Election tribunals were fighting for the right to cross-examine applicants, which were denied on the first date for recording the evidence of the respondents and after failing there, they too during the election tribunal cases. Lost their right to bring evidence through, it should be decided on merit and technical inadequacy should be rarely resorted to. In the interest of justice and justice, the Supreme Court provided the applicants with an opportunity to present their evidence so that the appeal for leave to appeal the declaration of the defendant's assets was converted into an appeal, so that the petitioners presented their evidence. As such, the orders passed by the Election Tribunal were set aside and the record of the applicant's evidence immigration advocates email from Gujar Khan lawyer