Find a Lawyer

DR. SYEDRAZA ALI GARDEZI versus ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

R14 (2) The applicant claimed that he was a resident of the Pakistan Employees Co-operative Housing Society and wanted to give priority to the appeal against the copies of the decision and order which was requested. The decision was opposed by the petitioner, who may have the rights of property holders and even permanent residents in the parameters of the housing scheme or at least have some interest in restraining the essential features of the relevant claim. That decision and decree were finalized. And this should not be lightweight and applicants should have been endorsed by the particular content of the application so that substantive rights on the record justify the grant of a copy of the decision and a certified copy of the decree. Or materials available, the applicant who was a permanent resident of the relevant housing scheme. The final point of the order, as the final right of the order, was the first thing I was interested in was the question about the holder and the appeal that the applicant intended to file, these questions will be considered and their decision The appellate court will, and will not be suitable for the High Court at this stage, when examining the certified copy grant application. The details and features of the Appeal, recommended in filing the Prima facie case for the grant of certified copies by the applicant, were allowed in this connection. attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Mir Ali lawyer