Find a Lawyer

HYESONS SUGAR MILLS (PVT.) LTD versus CONSOLIDATED SUGAR MILLS LIMITED

Section 7 and 12 (5) Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), section 12 (2) suit for debt collection, section 12 (2), application against the creditor of a fraudulent decision in the application under CPC, Approval and order approvals were requested. Against the defendants who guaranteed that they failed to verify the bail, the debtor / applicant of the judgment was guaranteed to pay the entire outstanding amount, the payment of the amount was unwarranted, the loan Claims filed by the bank for recovery were filed by the judges under section 12 (2), the CPC has alleged that the fraudulent decision to defraud the accused on the basis of the judgment. The only and only decision-maker can be considered an internal matter between the former and the new administration and may not be worth it. For the interference under section 12 (2), the CPC provisions of section 12 (2), the CPC could only be suppressed if the court and judgment were fraudulent. Such fraud was obtained, much of the judgment of the judge's indebtedness only after it had come to the decision that the judge's appeal against the judgment and injunction in this case was preferred. , But he could not succeed in proceedings under section 12 (2). The CPC application filed by the decision-makers may be rejected because the decision was granted under the banking jurisdiction and the suit and the jurisdiction of the banking jurisdiction, and in banking law Revision or consideration of decision, order or decree passed under banking, in the context of a negative clause immigration advocates phone number from Rawat lawyer