MUHAMMAD ASLAM versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB
Three teachers were appointed under a constitutional petition before the High Court for the selection of the post of PTC teachers in Arts 185 (3) and 1991. As a result of the election, the applicant challenged the appointment of only one teacher through a constitutional petition, which was rejected by the High Court's rationale behind such an election procedure. The constitutional petition challenging the selection and appointment of a teacher will be completely ineligible, the response to the hearing of the constitutional petition is that the teacher's name has been excluded from the memo of the petition filed before the Supreme Court, against such defendant. No negative order can be approved. Their application as a party to the proceedings was dismissed by the Supreme Court.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates phone number from Sara e Naurang lawyer