Find a Lawyer

HAJI MUHAMMAD BOOTA versus MEMBER (REVENUE), BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB

Section 11, O VII, R 11 & O XXIII, R 1 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 172 and 185 (3) Supreme Court Rules, 1980, O XV, R 1 Second case Withdrawal of first case in appeal before the Supreme Court After the court again dismissed the trial in the second case on the basis of a judicial decision. Both parties failed in the first phase of litigation until the High Court, claiming to have filed a property claim, instructed the collector to take steps for his position, but later appealed before the Supreme Court. Withdrawn. The trial court's dismissal of the second case on the same property was rejected and the withdrawal of the order of the High Court order was not allowed. The order of the courts below this order could have no effect, Which was sustained after the appeal was dismissed by the Supreme Court. Following the High Court's disqualification in the early stages of litigation, it was directed that Article 172 of the Constitution should take action to acquire the property. Under the constitutional mandate, the Seoul government, which cannot be discouraged from withdrawing the appeal, was bound by all the parties to the decree passed by the courts earlier in the trial, leaving the angry party with a single seat on the merit against the decision. While allowing for deportation. The case was not resolved in the case of the following suit for the petitioners after losing the case to the High Court; the effect of the cases decided against them could not be allowed to be terminated only if Supreme Court order with their permission list of supreme court advocates from Mithi lawyer