Find a Lawyer

AKBAR ALI versus MUHAMMAD AYUB

The plaintiff's claim that the execution of the consideration of section 12 and 42 constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) sale agreement, balance, was that the total amount agreed upon by the parties was Rs. From the time of execution of the contract, the sum of R-Section 3 was received by the defendant, the contract was accepted by the defendant and he acknowledged receipt of only Rs. 1,00,000 at the time of execution of the contract. The trial court had pronounced the verdict and directed the plaintiff to collect the balance amount of Rs. 7,00,000. The High Court amended the judgment and decree passed by the trial court which included only Rs. ? Was determine as was n Pay, the trial court had approved the decision in order to deceive the plaintiff and yogurt. The trial court concluded that the plaintiff paid Rs. 3,00,000 as a sum of Rs. 3,00,000 in the contract agreement. However, while the High Court had decided that only Rs.100,000 was paid in such case, the Supreme Court refused to interfere with the decision and the leave to appeal by the High Court was denied. immigration advocates email from Kamra lawyer