Find a Lawyer

DR. SALEEM JAVED versus MST. FAUZIA NASIM

Sections 212, 213 and 214 Certificate of Succession, Provision of Luxury Standards Charges on the Property of the Assessee Defendant Respondent charged with defaulting property by paying the victim for beneficial investment and secure custody. What is the claim Enforce the defendant as a party to the proceedings while the High Court allows the use of the jurisdiction of the review to be amended and the defendant was applied as a party to the process and the application submitted by the appellant It was held that the money given by the defendant to the deceased was not charged on the deceased's property, so it could not be enforced as a party to the proceedings under Sections 212, 213 and 214 of the Succession Act 1925. The respondent is not the legal heir of the deceased nor has any court ruled in his favor. Defendant's claim as to charge of the deceased's property, so the provisions of the Succession Act, 1925 will not be helpful. To ensure that the victim's property is not charged without proper determination by the competent forum. , Respondents could not have been enforced as an integral party in the proceedings under the Succession Act 1925, nor would the successor of the deceased court in the case related to the case be given a succession certificate. Can oppose and oppose. The succession certificate cannot decide on a third person claim against the deceased. Know the deceased's legal heritage best advocate from Thul lawyer