Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AFZAL versus MUHAMMAD AYUB

Sections 12 and 27 (b) of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3), without notice, the specific performance of the contract for the sale of bona fide buyer's puppy 7 The plaintiff's resident in the same area was subsequently sued by the buyer. Argued that the agreement was executed to sell the suit to the landlord in his favor, and that the land was sold to the defendants after the agreement, to the extent that the trial court purchased the defendants' land. The case was dismissed and the High Court affirmed the finding of the trial court play taken by the plaintiff. As the defendants are residents of the same village and adjoining area, it should be understood that the seller has knowledge of the execution of the contract. There was no evidence of justification that the defendants were unaware of the execution of the sale agreement in their favor. The issue of entering into a sale agreement in favor of the plaintiff was subsequently referred to the buyer as a defendant in the SP case. Excellent performance of a sales contract If it is requested that it has purchased the value of the land for valuable consideration without informing the previous sale agreement, in such case the plaintiff will be subject to positive false evidence. Had to prove that he had knowledge of it. Without providing any proof of contract sale, it cannot be assumed that the defendants were aware of the contract, being from the same area or village, the plaintiffs faced wrong reading or non-reading of the facts recorded by the courts. Didn't have to Any evidence of a vacation interference guarantee for the Supreme Court appeal famous high court advocate from Jehanian lawyer