Find a Lawyer

HAJI MUHAMMAD SANAULLAH versus CIRCLE REGISTRAR, COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES

Section 44Constitution Pakistan (1973), Article 199 The applicant dismissed from the service of constitutional application was dismissed from the job without issuing showcase notices and on duty duty and to explain and prove his position. An Opportunity Given Any Accusation That the Authorized Authority Was Sacked His innocence before his dismissal was a stain on his career that required full inquiry by the Cooperative Society before the dismissal order. He was not given a chance to be heard before the memorandum was accepted and even stated the charges. Was not provided and is not. They were demanded that under the circumstances, the finding of the Managing Committee on the fraud of the petitioner, without legal authority and without jurisdiction, the cooperative society violated the applicant by violating the principles of natural justice. The dismissal order was approved where applicants were regularly welcome. The inquiry, as it was supposed to be conducted, but was not done, was found to be inadmissible by the Cooperative Society as a result of the applicant's findings without final inquiry as the matter was sent to the Registrar for termination of the Society's services. Can The employee of the society provided under section 44C of the Cooperative Society Act, 1925 could only recommend that the applicant be removed from service and the Society itself could not approve the dismissal order stating that the applicant was a temporary employee Can be eliminated anyway. The time was suspended because the applicant did not expire during the suspension period online advocate from Kohistan lawyer