REHMAT BIBI versus MEMBER (REVENUE), BOARD OF REVENUE
Arts: 185 (3) and 189 West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), the decision on sections 42 and 45, devolution of the inheritance of the Supreme Court, the dispute between the parties was finally decided by the Supreme Court and the respondents were asked to take up the matter. Held. Revenue Authority, entitled to inherit property lawsuit, makes necessary changes to the revenue record Applicants accepted the Revenue Authorities' orders in the constitutional jurisdiction on the ground that this change was in the interests of the electors in favor of the predecessor. I've been In response to the question, the land had changed hands and the stability and the status of the land have also changed due to the stabilization process. Is it possible that applicants can raise these points in advance? The Revenue Authorities, who have been tasked with reviewing the mutations, had further observed in the High Court that if the applicant or anyone else is having trouble with the decision of the Department of Revenue, then the applicants have to redress their grievances. The opportunity provided by the High Court regarding the exercise of constitutional jurisdiction may not have been open to any exception. Appeal denied
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous high court advocate from Mardan lawyer