Find a Lawyer

THE STATE/ANTI-NARCOTICS FORCE, REGIONAL DIRECTORATE, SINDH versus SHAKEEL AHMED SIDDIQUI

Section 428 Control of Narcotic Substances (XXV of 1997), Section 9 (c) Constitution of Pakistan (1973); Article ?55 ()) was brought before the High Court by the accused, who was not aware of it. Chars was present in the cartoons kept by his friend in his room, but when he found out that the guns were in place, Chars immediately informed the officers, including the Regional Drug Director Regional Director General, Section 428, filed under the CRPC with the petition before the High Court that it was allowed to examine the then Regional Director General. , Primarily as a witness in his defense. On the basis that since the registration of this case, his position has been that the case has been wrongly unsuccessful and that the co-accused (his friend) persuaded him to take her home. Placing / placing the carton in the room, the charismatic High Court of Appeal allowed the defendant's request for accuracy, which should be examined after his oath, he was a responsible government officer and The court will consider the evidence. Upon scrutiny as required by law, the acceptance of the application by the High Court, Section 2828, under the CCPC, in its judicial discretion, was not in violation of the law and principles of the High Court, Considering the entire content in proper context, the defamation order did not demand intervention power of attorney advocate Ghazi lawyer