Find a Lawyer

AYUB KHAN versus THE STATE

Sections 1212 & 11 of the Criminal Code of Conduct (XLV of 60 X X60), Article 230/4/324 / QQ Law in the Martyrs (1984, 1984 of the Ten), Article P47 petitioner had prayed that the complainant's statement in a criminal case filed under Section 121212 be transferred to the CRP Sessions Judge's file as stated in the Complainant Section 1212, CRPC's own statement. After the recording of the case, he was found guilty of involvement in a murder case and was not likely to appear before the trial court. Stated that the complainant himself was refusing to appear before the trial court and was trying to transfer his statement considered by section by12 by to the trial court file, constituted by the CCP witness itself. Was granted and therefore was not entitled to be summoned from the court. The execution of the provisions of section 121212, CCP, was transferred to the High Court by the complainant's father in the face of a conflict of interest and rights of the accused / defendant. Was one of the witnesses. He was neither a complainant nor a prosecutor would be considered a criminal case or an inquiry between the prosecutor and the accused. The present petitioner had not received any locus standi, which was based on financial matters, in order to pass the petition before the High Court. The defendant's statement that the complainant's statement under Section 121212, CRPC, for the purpose of his compatibility and confession was not for the purpose of forwarding the conclusion of justice, he wrote in the law evidence article 47 Testing by the provisions of best advocate from Lakimarwat lawyer