Find a Lawyer

ABDUR RAZAQ versus THE STATE

Sections 497, 167 and 344 of the Prohibition (Enforcement Order) Order (4 of 1979), the Guaranteed Code of Conduct for the Arts 3/4 Investigation Agency, were extremely regrettable, which delayed the filing of the invoice in court without justification. And despite repeated instructions in this regard, the prosecution failed to comply with the law and failed to comply with the rules set by the magistrates and other courts at the district level, CRPC was thus Was not demonstrating full confidence in the requirements of 167 and 344. The police, according to their wishes and wishes, withheld the challan from the court for a long time and the accused had the unalienable right to fast-track and any unnecessary delay at the interrogation phase must delay the conclusion of the trial. Which denies him this right. The expression of any opinion on the basis of an assertion for bail at such a stage would certainly have led to the prosecution of the prosecution in the trial, which had already begun. In the interest of justice, the trial court was directed to hold the trial within two months, otherwise the accused would be considered released on bail. The bail application was dealt with by the High Court. registration advocate from Chiniot lawyer