Find a Lawyer

EX-HAWALDAR ATLAS KHAN versus INSPECTOR-GENERAL, PRISONS. N.-W.F.P., PESHAWAR

Section 10 (3) of the Adultery (Enforcement Hoodoo) Ordinance 1979 (Pakistan) 1973 (1973), Arts 199/25 Explosive Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 109 Constitution Petition Petitioner as well as other cookies were punished. The adulteration petitioner claimed that the government had apologized for all the offenders, but that the privileges were denied without any good reason. As a confession, Petitioner was convicted under Section 10 (3) of the Enforcement Hood Ordinance. , Because of the 1979 decision, was approved by the military authorities in 1979 and on appeal, the sentence was reduced to 10 years. Subsection (4) was included in section 10 of the Ordinance on 21-4 1997, when the alleged offense took place in May. , 1996 and the sentence was passed on 22 12 1996. Subsection 10 (4) was not included in section 10 of the ordinance at the time of sentencing. The Podi Advocate General also conceded that the applicant is entitled to apologize in his sentence, it is permissible for other offenders in a similar situation. The High Court accepted the constitutional petition and directed that the petitioner According to the law, there should be an apology. when you need a advocate from Kashmore lawyer