Find a Lawyer

MIAN MUHAMMAD ARSHAD versus THE STATE

Section 9 (c) Prohibited (Enforcement) Order (4 of 1979), Arts 3/4 Definition of Evidence The evidence of the prosecution's witnesses was contradictory and controversial. A witness to the prosecution was a stock witness appearing in the exclusion case. Police suspected the presence of a witness at the scene of the incident prior to the current case, suspecting that two other witnesses of the prosecution contradicted each other at the material point I, the way the incident occurred. And in relation to the contradiction of the implication. The prosecution's witnesses and the investigating officer's statements about the location of the incident were present. The investigating officer stated that the adviser was present at the detention while according to the adviser, he arrived at the scene of the incident and found the accused in the custody of the two constables, especially with regard to the location of the incident, the prosecution's case was highly suspicious. There was no record of any suspicion suggesting that the prosecution had proven the suspect's conscious possession in connection with the allegedly prohibited drug, there is no doubt that the allegedly contraband drug Huge quantities were recovered, but the fact alone could not have been the basis for the conviction of the accused In the absence of verse satisfactory basis for the trial court convicted the accused and sentenced him, he was released and acquitted of charges property advocates from Dera Ghazi Khan lawyer