MUHAMMAD AKRAM versus THE STATE
Article 302 (b) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) At the relevant time, the presence of witnesses, including the complainant in the house complaint, was quite natural and there is no doubt that the accused denied presence in his house on that day. Did not No explanation was given for how the deceased's wife slept with him in a room in his house, and in what circumstances, with a sharp weapon on the sensitive part of her body. The wounds were inflicted, and he was denied any knowledge of the incident. Failure to present the required explanation provided strong impetus to the witnesses' account to prove him guilty. Available on the record to indicate that the accused had suddenly acted under provocation, exchanging words between the deceased was not allowed in the domestic affairs of the husband and wife as the accused accused of killing his wife. The defendant did not even make any plea in his defense that the accused could not be eased in the matter of punishment. The minor dispute led to the killing of an innocent and helpless woman. The accused was denied
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocate from Ubaro lawyer