Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ABBAS versus THE STATE

The abduction and adulteration case, allegedly for the re-arrest of sections 10 (3) (4) and 11 of the evidence, took place overnight and was filed by the prosecution 7/8 days after the incident. And the delay in filing an FIR was explained. It was submitted that the accused persons were trying to compromise with him by means of a \ panchayat \ justification except for any evidence of prosecution \ by the members of the panchayat or by any other person, especially his The father, who was in the house when the prosecutor allegedly was abducted, was abducted by the accused at gunpoint, delaying filing the prosecution's FIR cousin. Who has been involved in investigating the case from the very beginning, when asked about the delay in filing an FIR The prosecution's version was not supported except to respond to the suggestion that it was for prosecutors or that family members would file a report on it, and neither the prosecutor's brothers nor sisters filed an FIR. The delays were not forthcoming to support, if the outcome of the adultery with the prosecutors began to emerge, could not be considered fatal to the trial. At a later stage, the doctor, with the serologist's report, considered the doctor's report, along with the prosecutor, gave a positive opinion about Xena's commission, which showed that the prosecutor had a sperm in her vagina. The testimony was given. It can be concluded that as in the present case, 7/8 days after the commission of the crime, advocate from Ahmed pur Sial lawyer