Find a Lawyer

SHER BAZ KHAN versus THE STATE

O XXXII, Rr 1 and 2 minor, a girl, on finding out about two land sale transactions, they were found to be unlawful, unauthorized, without any consideration and their proprietary rights and property rights. He challenged them as invalid, moreover, on the issue that, when she was a minor, the controversial transaction took place, that the sale was unauthorized and fraudulent and there was no sale for it. Transfer was unable to prove its transaction under the sale. The sale itself showed that the sale was intended to be considered a large amount but there was no clear evidence that they had said that the money had been provided to the seller / seller and If so, where the money was deposited or the sales data are kept. The mutation itself showed that no payment was made at the time of confirmation of the change, whereas there was no strong evidence for the fact that the earlier acquisition was made only with the acknowledgment of the transfer of land. The power of the attorney was presented by the minor's father in favor of the alleged lawyer, because the best evidence was the document itself, which should be presented in evidence along with the evidence of his execution, which should be transferred. After the failure, the transfer tried to present a copy of the said power of attorney whose production was properly rejected because the secondary evidence could not be allowed to go until the absence of preliminary evidence. I do not need the law, meaning that the power of attorney was established to satisfy the court property advocate from Bajaur lawyer