Find a Lawyer

MUMTAZ versus THE STATE

Definition of Section 2302 (b) of the evidence suppressed the fact that five persons were killed by the accused and four persons were injured. The incident did not take place in the accused's fields as the bodies of the accused's bodies. Is accused of. Persons were recovered from the house of a person belonging to the complaining party and the blood-stained ground was recovered from under the bed where the bodies were found, according to the prosecution, indiscriminate firing at the time of the incident. But none of the offenses could have been secured by the trial court on the same evidence had acquitted eleven accused in the case, there was a previous rivalry between the parties and because of maintaining such independent bilateral relations. Was required for the lack of an ocular account. The prosecution's case was filled with suspicion, contradicting the medical evidence. The accused was acquitted of the situation. A convicted accomplice accused who had not filed an appeal, was also acquitted by the High Court. divorce advocates from Pishin lawyer