Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ANWAR KHAN versus HABIB BANK LTD.

Sections 6 and 11 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O XXI, R 52 Execution of Order Order, Failure to Record Conflict of Fact The failure to record evidence was the object of the bank's right to attach the property at any time I was not held in mortgage. For the purpose of the judgment and to protect the interest of the original mortgagee, the property was enclosed, while the original mortgage was not even enforced in the suit. The justification raised was not considered through banking. The court and its decision were made only in view of the bank's crucial question whether the mortgage was favored by the mortgagee in favor of the bank, requiring determination through the production of evidence, recording the evidence of the parties. Without this, such a realistic dispute could not be resolved at the hearing of the parties. Only the banking court was not mechanically bound to record the evidence. The banking court had to look into the individual case of the objector in each case to see if there was any special. Whether the recording of evidence in the case is guaranteed and whether the object nomination is a serious, irrelevant one Whether the original petition was filed or delayed in proceedings, it was primarily the banking court's decision to decide whether the request for the objection was to be made after the recording of the evidence or only after the parties' hearing. Doing so was one of the cases where the objector should have been given the opportunity to present evidence. Establish this claim as the property in compliance with the decree passed against the lender. property advocate from Tharo Shah lawyer