Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN versus BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB, LAHORE

Section,, & and ?? Acquisition of the Land Issuing Notices to Persons Interested in the Award Content and substantial legal damages whose impact the Collector has given to the Award is substantially and substantially prejudicial, There was a similar error in the view because there was no content in the record. Under Section 9 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, the notices were actually submitted to the interested landlords. The acquisition proceedings began with the publication of a notification under section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, the land was seized by the authority and for the first time landlords took notice. Section 9 of the Land Acquisition Act of 1894 was issued after a lapse of seventeen years, which consisted of a generally public notice stating the proposed acquisition and compensation claims from all interested persons. Was invited. A special or personal notice to be presented to the residents and every other interested person for the same thing as the sons' award given by the collector did not make it clear that the award notice was merely a general notice or the Land Acquisition Act, Under section 9 of 1894 the notices were necessary to exercise the jurisdiction of the collector so that it could be ratified. The action and the imperative requirement for the acquisition and finalization of the land should be strictly prohibited, that no notice was ever issued nor the landlord served, the action taken was natural justice. Violation of the principle of award was, in the circumstances, section 9 of the Land Acquisition Act, with no legal authority and no legal effect. famous high court advocate from Arifwala lawyer