MUHAMMAD RASHID versus SHAHID AZIZ
Article 12 of the Convention of Contempt (Article 10 of 1984), Articles 72, 78 and 79 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the specific performance of the agreement by the plaintiff to sell the executor by the plaintiff on a contract to be a minor witness The defendant filed a denial of the implementation of such an agreement to prove the execution of the agreement, contradicting the evidence presented by the defendant where the agreement was written, confessing to the witnesses. Admitted that they were not the names of these unknown persons. The parties and the accused were to be at the place where the agreement was written and the parties requested that the documents be a minor testimony of the trial court as well as the High Court dismissed the case and the plaintiff's affirmed appeal was such. ? A strange behavior by the parties that invites strangers to testify for the execution of a document and that the witnesses are the alleged owner of the document's execution because of the reasons presented by the courts. Identity was not sought or unreasonable, nor did the Sunni Supreme Court refuse to deny the harmony of the two courts.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
patent advocate from Bhara Kahu lawyer