Find a Lawyer

BAQAR versus ALLAH DITTA

Article Q 45 Constitution of the Law (Sun 1984 1984 1984 1984) Arts 117 and 120 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) A special and sole proof of the gift proof renovation in determining the question of ownership Failure and failure to prove the gift owner's declaration The suit refusal to make a gift in favor of the defendant was filed in favor of the plaintiff on behalf of the plaintiff in the fact that he filed a gift affirmation The suit landed in favor of the defendant but was obtained through fraud. The plaintiff failed to substantiate the facts of the occupation by significant and concrete evidence. The evidence was silent as to where, why and to whom the gift was given through the plaintiff's trial, but the appellate court allowed the appeal and upheld the decision to retain the case in favor of the plaintiff's High Court. Was gone and the appellate court-approved verdict and judgment was upheld, with no evidence. In pursuit of the gift, the physical possession of the suit land was handed over to the defendant, the fact of the mutation cannot be considered as the sole and sole evidence for determining the question of ownership which constitutes a valid gift around it. The defendants lacked conclusions because the appellate court agreed with the High Court on the basis of reasonable reasoning, which cannot be ruled out on the basis of rape, the defendant guarantees high interference, the High Court Failure to identify any type of illegal instability was denied in the decision passed by best advocate from Patoki lawyer