Find a Lawyer

MANAGING DIRECTOR, SUI SOUTHERN GAS COMPANY LTD., KARACHI versus GHULAM ABBAS

He was also a member of the Section 3 Tribunal hearing as Chairman of the Bench. Whereas sections AA (a) (a) and (b) of the Act, provided that the decision is heard by a majority of the members and in the case of discrimination between the members of the bench or the equal distribution of members, the matter should be referred to the chairman. Ga and whichever opinion expressed by him would be superseded, and in the present case, the decision of the Tribunal was written by the Chairman, and all the members agreed with it. , Assuming that a member has joined the proceedings without any legal authority but can still retain the decision, because he was presented by a bench comprising more than two members of the tribunal and The member's (retired) fears about influencing the decision were dropped. Since the verdict was written by the former High Court Judge as the chairman of the service tribunal and could be immediately disposed of under the de facto ideology Syed Member, before his retirement he could perform the same duties. Therefore, it will be considered that in the exercise of the same powers in good faith, he himself will be involved in this matter, in which the involvement of the member as a member of the bench did not cause any prejudice. In the parties, because he did not write the decision, nor was it likely to influence the decision in any way because the same chairman had authored it and the other two members had written it. What was the agreement with: famous high court advocate from Jhal Magsi lawyer