Find a Lawyer

MAJOR (R.) NADIR ALI versus THE STATE

National Accountability Bureau Ordinance 1999 Section 10/11/12 The FIR was filed with an unusual delay without cause for any reason, which led to its authenticity, leading to the prosecution's case. Suspicion was made against which the prosecutor had set his case, he proved it and the purpose for which he offered the bribe to the complainant was mysteriously investigated, While investigating the prosecution's story illegally by the police, the investigating officer did not explain the delay in recording the prosecutor's statements. Despite the witnesses who doubted their credibility, the identity parade was not held in the case even though the prosecution's witnesses did not know the accused who was deadly for the prosecution case, the complaint itself proved on record. The real facts were not challenged by the defense, the investment was challenged by the fact that the jetting officer was obliged to obtain his certificate of truth from the State Bank of Pakistan, which he was! The prosecution witnesses were interested witnesses who were closely related to the complainant, who made material statements and made their statements invalid by invalidating their statements. On the benefit of the doubt in the circumstances law firms from Tank lawyer