Find a Lawyer

HAJI NADIR KHAN versus THE STATE

Section 2 (2 (b) / re 34) definition of evidence cannot be used as a piece of evidence when the pistol is recovered and vacant at the scene of the incident because the two articles mentioned were not sent to the ballistic expert for report. There was also a certified witness, who did not endorse that the recovery complainant did not witness the incident and did not disclose who had made the person aware of the incident. The deceased was taken to the complainant's house and was the only witness who was shown eye witness, the prosecution was not examined. On the fifth or fifth day the witnesses were introduced and their statements were recorded on the sixth day of the incident under Section 161, CR PC, saying that the prosecution's witnesses whose behavior was otherwise impossible and unnatural Can't be done when they were present at the scene The incident was suspicious The prosecution's witnesses did not give any account of the incident, it happened and they were usually fired, the accused attacked and contradicted the accused. There were contradictions in the statements, the trial court erroneously relied on the statements of the prosecution witnesses to make their statements a medical evidence. D was recovered, the prosecution failed to bring domestic charges to the accused, they were acquitted. Give the benefit of the doubt registration advocate from Kundina lawyer