MUHAMMAD ARIF versus THE STATE
The Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 10 Criminal Procedure Code (V 1898), Definition of Section 367 Evidence Failed to decide whether this offense, if it is considered, committed adultery. Or one of the provisions of section 10 of the Adultery Bill Reza and Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 for which the accused was convicted and mentioned in the indictment as well as section 10. Such conduct was postponed to trial by the superior courts even in the trial, keeping the decision in accordance with the terms of section 676767. CR's only witness was first examined by police after 5/5. Six days after the incident, no FIR was registered with the victim in connection with the commission of adultery by the accused. The incident was registered on the night of the rat with a clear, clear identification of the incident. The accused was not proved on record by the evidence and circumstances of the accused by the said witness, and no other evidence had confirmed the testimony of the eyewitness, who could have mistaken himself in the identity of the accused Zakim, with whom the accused. Was allegedly murdered for adultery. Within three days of the incident, his own version was not on record in this regard, thus, the accused was lodged a case, therefore, he was not free from any suspicion, the accused was acquitted in the cases. Was.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of advocates from Phool nagar lawyer