Find a Lawyer

SHAH NAWAZ versus THE STATE

The definition of evidence in section 10 (2) was quite different from the ocular evidence presented to the investigating officer in relation to the version given by the complainant in this regard and it was stated that the version contained material from the FIR. Was controversial under which the accused could dare to commit the subject. The credibility of the complainant's statement was further strained by the fact that the girl, Xena Bill Jabber, was engaged in cutting grass in the same area where the complainant was her maternal uncle. The prosecution's witnesses were also cutting grass. At a time when he had changed his version of the statement in court, saying that the prosecution's witnesses were attracted to their homes on the spot when the investigating officer's statement in connection with the arrest of the hearing suspect was a statement. ? The medical report did not support the contradictory statements of the victims, and the Chemical Examiner's report was also n. The Medical Examiner's report as well as the Chemical Examiner's report fully support the allegation that the alleged victim's adultery. Bill Labor was not targeted, which was not confirmed by medical evidence and the Chemical Examiner's report. , Which was not trustworthy, could not be relied upon to fail to prove his case against a prosecution suspect in a felony offense, the trial court's ruling and order was set aside and the accused Was acquitted. in charge law websites from Rahwali lawyer