MST. RIFFAT YASMEEN versus SARFRAZ HANIF
Crimes of adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 10 (4) Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 392/342/506/109/34 Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), Section 203 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 203 DD partially dismissing the complaint After the trial court recorded the evidence of the complaint proceedings against only two accused and did not call the three other accused named in the complaint without giving any reason, The recipient had the legal right to know why her complaint was dismissed against the three defendants and for what reasons could she consider referring to the amending court and Being kept in ignorance or prejudice of the reasons he was brought to the remedy against such order, if the matter goes to the review. The court will present the matter before the court. The trial court did not give any reason as to why the proceedings against the remaining accused were wise. Held, nor did he specify whether the complaint was excluded to his extent, nor was the complaint filed by the complainant on merit, decided by merit. The impeachment order was later set aside for trial in the case, along with the direction of the prosecution for the subsequent trial. The petitioner was allowed to request a re-modification to summon the remaining accused filed by law.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
how to become a advocate from Shogram lawyer