WALI MUHAMMAD versus MUHAMMAD RAFIQ
Section 34, (34 (?) and pre 35) No order for pre-emption emp 31 198 7 6 198 before was passed in favor of pre-emptor. The trial was dismissed by the trial court. Appeal against such decision was also unsuccessful in view of which the plaintiff claimed that under section 34 (2) and 35 of the Punjab Pre-Emission Act 1991, his case could not be dismissed and he was always Under section 35 of the Punjab Permission Act, he could demand reinstatement of his case, 1991 the legality of the plaintiff was terminated because the Punjab Pre-Emission Act of 1991 on his case. Or did not apply section 34 (2) and 35
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
when you need a advocate from Mansehra lawyer
