Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

ASHIQ HUSSAIN versus THE STATE


Appeals against section 101010, 33 Penn and Code 367 of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 302 Constitution of Pakistan (173), Article 185 (3) against the High Court for reasons not exempted from the sentence. CR PC, determined to note the duty duty in court and subsequently the high point for record decision was impressed by the report of the Investigation Officer, who had acquitted him of the charge, once The accused was summoned to court under Section 173, CRPC, and the prosecutor presented evidence against him, after which the court was bound to decide the case based on the contents of the record. D and he was not obliged to follow up on the news of the investigating officer being temporary in nature. Such a breach was not sustained in law. The case was remanded to the High Court for its fresh verdict.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
ask a advocate free from Jaranwala lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.