SH. MUHAMMAD AMJAD versus THE STATE
Appeal to summon a witness under Section 540, Section 404040, PC Validity Court has the power to re-seek and examine any person if his evidence is necessary for a fair decision in this case. It seems, however, that the decision of a case depends on the decision. In each case, the law does not require that when an application is made, in the same way, all conditions can be approved, nor can a system of criminal administration of justice be allowed to defect. The process established in the name of justice can be defeated. The purpose of section 404040 is to defend the interests of the CCP justice and not to defeat such a request cannot be allowed when the sanctity of the trial court is violated and the version of the prosecution is to build a tent in yellow. Is to create instability. Seeking such testimony, in the present case, was neither taken before the trial court nor in the High Court nor for the first time before the Supreme Court for the court to adjourn the proceedings and the trial. With the sole purpose of raising doubts, the High Court affirmed that the Supreme Court dismissed such a request as a complete misunderstanding.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
ask a advocate free from Mangi lawyer