Find a Lawyer

CAPT. ASIF ALI, DIVISIONAL ELECTRICAL ENGINEER, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT versus SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, ESTABLISHMENT DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Sections 2 (b), 4 and 9A [as entered by the mandatory service is the Armed Forces (Amendment) Ordinance (IV of 1978]] Essential Services in the Armed Forces Rules, 1971, R 13 mandatory persons (Registration) Ordinance (X) 1948), Section 2 (a) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 1212 (3) Counting the period of compulsory service rendered in the Armed Forces by seniority in the seniority civil service in previous history. Was appointed after Ali's appointment, but it was shown that the plaintiff's list allowed the respondents to appeal to the plaintiff by the competent authority under Section 9A of the Armed Forces Ordinance, 1971 The appeal was dismissed by the Armed Forces Department filed by the defendants, but their appeal before the service tribunal was accepted before the service tribunal seriously considered the services rendered in the Armed Forces. We will consider handling the status quo. Services were served until 1992, but after that such policy was amended and officers were required to prove that such services were sought to be interpreted by their elders, the Tribunal said. There was no attempt to elaborate on such a policy. To appeal the facts and circumstances of the present case, the Supreme Court accepted this appeal by the service tribunal, at the age of 2/2, to benefit the appellant from the service of his compulsory army. Denied the tribunal's order. And obtained remand for fresh judgment of the case in accordance with the laws and regulations governing this case lawer from fb area from Narang Mandi lawyer