MUHAMMAD NAWAZ versus ZARAI TARAQIATI BANK LIMITED
Section 9 and 7 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O. VIII, R11 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 10 Banking Court Scoop's Dossier Requires Client / Plaintiff to File Claim for Declaration Before Banking Court What was The effect was that the plaintiff did not hold any charge against the plaintiffs' bankruptcy court, after presenting the cases, dismissing the case on the basis of the defendant / bank statement that the bank could recover the loan without the determination of the competent court. Will not take drastic action against the plaintiff. The plaintiff's position was that the banking court's ruling was inappropriate in law, under the provisions of Section 9 of the Financial Institutions (Retrieval of Finance) Ordinance 2001, if the financial institution committed a default in the fulfillment of any obligation. After financing, the customer was able to file a lawsuit in the banking court by presenting a plaintiff after the financial institution. The Houses Ordinance, 2001, did not provide a procedure in relation to the plaintiff's investigation, therefore, as set out under Order VII, Rule 11, the CPC applied to raids before the Banking Court. Was, to determine if the plaintiff had any. Order VII, Rule 11, whether or not the proceedings were for the purpose of CPC were the facts stated in the plaintiff's claim only on the basis of the statement of the plaintiff bank and at present may not be appropriate in the circumstances of the case. The banking court did not take into account the facts in the plaintiff's suit for recovery by the plaintiff bank in connection with the financial assistance received by the plaintiff's bank and if the plaintiff's behalf did not
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
