Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD MITHAL ALIAS WAHID BUX versus THE STATE

Sections 302 (a), 308 and 302 (c) define the evidence The prosecution's witnesses were with each other and despite the presence, no independent witness was presented by the prosecution by several persons in the area and the effect was There was no explanation. The evidence did not inspire confidence as the defense's plea was credible while two men were brutally deprived of their lives while taking the law into their own hands, in this case section a30 a (a), pp. Under C, the accused were convicted. And his death sentence under this circumstances was set aside and instead he was sentenced under Section 302 (c), PPC and sentenced the accused to a maximum of 25 years on that count. Was gone The accused did not bring on record that he and his deceased wife had any children. By virtue of their marriage and the provisions of Sections 306 and 308, the PPC, therefore, was not attracted to her case, changing the section 302, resulting in the conviction of the accused under section 308 ( C), the PPC had retained the 14-year RI given by his wife for the murder, but in the event that there was no notice to increase the sentence, However, both of those convictions were instructed to proceed with advantage. Section 382B, CCPC famous lower court advocate from Sanghar lawyer