Find a Lawyer

IMAM BUX ALIAS MAMA ALIAS AKHTAR versus THE STATE

The Pakistan Penal Code Section 392/34 Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), sections 6 (d) and 7 (iii) of the evidence agreed with every aspect of the ocular testimony case and was not charged and He was charged. Eyewitnesses recovered from their possession in the identity parade that the accused had snatched from the suspect through eyewitnesses, eyewitnesses were natural witnesses who had no suspicion in his presence which the accused did not even challenge. And they allege that the accused had been motivated by a complaint at a pistol point for fear of immediate death or immediate injury, for allegedly trapping the vehicle, which was filed under section 392, P.P.C. Can be sentenced to up to ten years. The offense of robbing a vehicle as defined under Section 6 (d) of the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997 can be punished for seven years under Section 17 (iii) of the said Act. Under the law, when a case falls under the general law as well as the special law, the provisions of the special law prevail and thus prevail over section 399, PPC, section 7 (III) of the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997. Are. The defendant's appeal was dismissed with the exception that his sentence was reduced to 10 years - each was sentenced to 7 years. pakistani advocates Shakargarh lawyer